This doctor from Washington advertises his "skills" in the SEAK 2017 directory. His Alaska "location" of course caught my eye. Then his phone number which is not Alaskan. Then came Washingotn and Hawaii. I wondered why I couldn't find him performing closer to home. Perhaps he doesn't want his local "patients" knowing about his moonlighting skills. To travel that far must certainly mean a gold mine of money for him. Very nice paid vacations that might possibly be disguised at tax time as business trips. Please note an earlier posted document connecting SEAK/ABIME with the Dept of Labor in Washington. This should give every injured worker a right to show concern over an IME perfomed by this man.

The Assistant Attorney General representing the insurance doctors feels that one of my physicians, Dr. Gunnar Heuser is less than reliable or credible. The following letter states just the exact opposite. One would certainly question that if this was a legitimate process, why one of the top experts in this country would not over ride an out of state insurance doctor hired by the same board trying to take my benefits away. If real experts are discredited it certainly shows intent to defraud.

This is an old document, but indoor air quality has been an issue for many years with health concerns that live on today.

For state employees, the system is owned and operated by the state. They license, hire, use and represent these insurance "doctors". The hearing officers are all state employees, It is said in a SEAK manual, "He who pays, gets the opinion." In Alaska's workers' comp system the quote should be, "He who gets the paycheck is owned, and the opinion is expected to be for the state". There is seemingly nowhere for the injured state worker to go for legitimate help within the state system. Additional correspondence from other state authorities/agencies will prove that even further.

Toxic Encephalopathy - It is very sad that workers' compensation is allowed to dismiss the seriousness of individuals with this injury. Especially when it's been proven by tests such as the P300 and PET Scan. To put them at further risk should be criminal. To knowingly put people in harms way or buy medical reports to deny them benefits, should be seen as some type of attempted murder. It would be if peanuts were deliberately given to someone with a peanut allergy, or force them to walk through a place that makes peanut butter. They need to be held accountable for further injuring a person who has provable health issues with exposures to chemicals.

T

QME reinstatement for Dr. Ajit Arora (deceased California comp "doctor").

Letters to state legislators. I wrote all of them asking for help, I did hear from just a few of them. Here I am again. The state bought a letter from Dr. Brent Burton stating my doctor is wrong, I can fly to see their next hired gun. I have tests that show what chemical poisoned me, a PET Scan, and a wealth of other tests that confirm, and WON my benefits back and received my medical retirement for. Yet, Burton, knows better than all according to him and apparently those in state government who are paying him to lie. FRAUD???? What do you think.